Thursday, May 4, 2023
Britain's Greatest Female Codebreaker
Last week I spoke at the Irish Embassy in London
at the launch of Jackie Uí Chionna's biography: Queen of Codes:
The Secret Life of Emily Anderson, Britain's Greatest Female Code Breaker.
I am part of the first generation of Siginters who joined
GCHQ after the Bletchley Park story had become avowed, and after the myth of
Bletchley had begun to take hold (How a Tiny Number of Boffins and Chess
Players Defeated Hitler and Won the War). For those of us interested in
accurate history, it was a bit hard to situate the myth against the realities
of Sigint in the Cold War, and I suppose it was the realisation that the myth
was a myth, and that by taking back bearings from where GCHQ was at the end of
the 1980s it might be possible to achieve a better and more three-dimensional
understanding of wartime Sigint.
That in turn, under the guidance of Peter Freeman,
developed into an interest in pre-Second World War Sigint: what happened in the
period leading up to 1914 to turn Sigint from a vague idea in August 1914 into
two going concerns by November 1914? What had the inter-war GC&CS achieved
that meant that it had been factored in to war planning as a 'must-have' by
1938?
It was in this context that I first began to come up
against references to Miss Emily Anderson. She had joined MI1(b) in 1918 from Galway
University and was the only woman to become a Junior Assistant in GC&CS. She
was formidable as a cryptanalyst, leading the Italian Section and recovering both
Italian codebooks and the key material the Italians used for superencipherment.
She trained new staff in cryptanalysis: not just members of staff, such as Wilfrid
Bosworth and Josh Cooper, but also the military staff attached to GC&CS
before being sent out to India or Palestine (Tiltman said that she seemed to
bully his attached officers). In 1940 she had gone to Combined Bureau Middle
East in Cairo to head up a detached GC&CS element to ensure that intelligence
to support allied operations in that theatre was received as messages were
decrypted, rather than depending on the vagaries of communications with
Bletchley Park. She stayed there throughout the Western Desert Campaign, then
returned to Berkeley Street to resume her work on enemy diplomatic telegrams
and retired before GCHQ moved to Cheltenham. Awarded the OBE for her service in
Cairo, she received after retirement the Cross of the Federal German Order of
Merit for her work on transcribing the letters of Mozart and Beethoven.
I am normally chary of expressions like 'Britain's Greatest
Female Codebreaker': if she was the 'greatest' shouldn't we be able to say who
was second greatest, and third, and fourth? It strikes me, though, that in this
case (as in Tiltman's) her claim to the title arises from the fact that there
is nobody else at all on the same level. Margaret Rock, and Joan Clarke, for
example, were exceptionally talented cryptanalysts, but achieved their results
as parts of a team working on different elements of the same problem, able to
draw on the successes of others to take their own work forward, and at a time,
and in an organisation that recognised and accepted the fact that women were as
able to do this work as men. Emily Anderson's talents were such that the
Admiralty effectively ignored the fact that she was a woman and turned her into
an honorary man (she was the only woman Junior Assistant) and paid her at much
more than the top of the female pay scale in order that she would work for
GC&CS. Her work on Italian diplomatic cryptosystems was a unique triumph:
she made the recoveries and built the Italian books herself, and trained staff
to be able to do as she did. Her insistence on going to Egypt so that the value
of her work could best be realised by allied forces was another example of an
indomitable desire to ensure that her skills weren't wasted.
I heartily recommend Jackie's biography of Emily Anderson,
and have tried to be careful here not to reveal the fruits of her research. Her
book makes clear that her achievements in musicology were as important as her
work on cryptanalysis – and shows that she was able to use the same techniques
in both fields; and the story of her family adds an unexpected element to her
story. I have followed this story for six years since I was first in contact
with Jackie and am astounded at the amount of new material she has been able to
find.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment